Friday, August 22, 2008

Of Guevaras In Gandhian Land...

New post... been long, I know. Only, my thought processes are getting more tangled than ever. So free... to the topic, then.

I was never a big worshiper of the Gandhian ideology, nor was I particularly interested or impressed with his life till recently. Back at school, studying history, I spent hours dozing off trying to read about our struggle for independence... the darn salt satyagrahas and Quit-India slogans were complete/alien crap to a guy like me, who had been raised on daily doses of gut-wrenching action and violence, courtesy, the good ol' cable-tv revolution.

My dad gifted me 'My Experiments With Truth' for my birthday... it spent a whole year in my bookshelf, crisp and untouched. Then, during my 1st year at college, something happened. Mouli man, always the one for a controversial comment, entertained us with his views on Gandhi...

"Over-rated, man. Thats all he is. We would have attained independence long before, had we waged a complete war like heroes. The guy slowed the whole thing down, with his non-violent 'I won't eat, I won't speak' crap."

Now, I was accustomed to Mouli's extreme views... the guy's sole aim is to contradict popular perception, but what infuriated me was the ease with which his comments were accepted. One guy went so far as to tell me that Mouli's comments had totally changed his views on Gandhi, and had influenced him. So I dug deep into some history again, confused over my generation's disdain for Gandhian values.

Fact of the matter is, we have no right whatsoever to even comment on the man who worked day and night for his country, toiled and struggled with a mighty empire, and brought it to its knees, fetching us our freedom in his own way. The guy LIVED his ideals. Compare this with the materialistic Indian of today, basking in the IT glory, living the Apple i-Lifestyle, working for Caucasian bosses, dancing like a puppet without caring about who pulls his strings, as long as he gets the money to buy his next i-Phone.

Truth and non-violence may seem trivial and laughable today, but the man gave these values a new makeover. I hear voices, voices echoing half-baked notions of protest that they have been programmed into believing as true. A guy told me:

"I hate Gandhi, man... I read that guy's autobiography. Jeez, man... You won't believe the SHIT he's done when he was a teen. I mean, goddamn it, he did everything he stood against later in life. Shit, he was doing his wife when his dad was dying, man!"

Yes, Gandhi had done stuff, I told him. He had sinned( if the religious rules imposed by our vedic ancestors centuries ago are held to be supreme, then yes). But he had the courage to admit his mistakes, on record. How many of us are willing to do that? Do you have the courage, I asked the guy, to go to your dad this very moment and tell him that you have been stealing from his purse for the past two years? Gandhi had nothing to hide. His life was an open book.

Unlike other revolutionaries, Gandhi did not force his philosophical views on anyone. He did not play the blame game, he criticized none, and he did not give up when the British Empire ridiculed him, unable to digest the fact that a thin old man was slowly, but steadily axing his way through the mighty oak their Empire was. He had the nerve to walk inside the Buckingham Palace, dressed in his usual single dhoti. Such nerve is a rarity now.

How many inspirational leaders can Indians boast of, anyway? In a country of a billion people, how many can we count up and say 'They lived for the country's pride, and died for it!'. Very few. In a land of leaders who suck up the blood and money of the citizens, leaders like Gandhi, Tilak and Vallabhai Patel are revelations.

Some people think that Gandhi was too mild, his methods were too soft. Well, these methods worked eventually, did they not? Look what happened to Subash Chandra Bose, a man who believed in fighting might with might, and disappeared off the face of Earth. Look what happened to Bhagat Singh. These leaders fought, yes, their commitment was never under question. But they failed to achieve their life's aim of seeing an independent India. Gandhi lived to see that. But he wasn't happy, because he saw an India torn by religious and cultural differences. He couldn't bear to see his countrymen killing each other, vandalizing and rioting in the name of religion and caste. Anyone can take up arms to rebel against the existing system, but to destabilize them by peaceful means requires nerves of steel.

Many Hindus believed that he was biased towards the Muslims. His advice to the Hindus was simple: ' Do not harass the minority, because every Indian has earned his freedom'. The seperation of Pakistan came as a blow to him.

The man inspired other great leaders like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King with his ideals and his undying spirit. And what did we do to him? We shot him dead. Are we so pathetic a country that we remember the most singly influential man of our nation only through a series of comedy capers like Lage Raho Munnabhai and on television polls going 'Is Gandhi a social icon in Emerging India?'..?

Emerging India is a myth built around decades of poverty, communal tension, corruption and unemployment, by the ever changing forces of chance, lop sided growth and mere opportunistic buy-it-while-you-can commercialization and consumerism. The country is bleeding, reeling under obscene levels of inflation, while the so-called new generation Indians look around at the Mercs and Skodas cruising around their urban locale and convince themselves that everything is all right, and their country is rising fast, just behind China.

You have to be on the rural side to see the real picture. The hunger, the pain, and the incredibly corrupt bureaucrats.

Gandhi-bashing is not cool. Any self-respecting Indian has to think twice before mindlessly criticizing Gandhi over the other 'cool' alternatives like Guevara and Hitler. Trust me, half the guys who voice their admiration for Hitler's command and Guevara's attitude have no idea of what they are talking about. They care not about history, its the In-thing that matters.

I hope Indians learn to respect their own heroes... we are losing our identity in a flash of globalisation ... let us not lose our icons too.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then you win."- MK Gandhi

This is me, signing off. Peace.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

There'll never be a thing or a person who is universally loved by all. Mahatma Gandhi is not an exception to this rule. There was one huge fight between me and Mooli and some of our friends after we saw "Gandhi My Father" and you know some ppl argue just for the heck of it. Agreed He had his negatives but the guy was a fucking genius.

We are all entitled to our opinions and I'm sure Gandhi will just smile and say "free" if someone goes to him and says that his methods suck.

After all, Free maybe the greatest Gandhian Philosophy of all time. free..

And all the horrendeous fights after independance which eventually led to the partition might have even led Gandhi to believe that we would have been better off under the Scumbags coz atleast we were united when we were fighting the vellaikarans and then divided and fucked up everything once we had our destinies under our control...

“Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.”

- Albert Einstein On Gandhi.

One cannot have anything more to add after a brilliant quote like that.

Gandhi = Absolute.Fucking.Legend.

whether you like it or not.

Free..

Anonymous said...

Btw I hope you finished his autobio, I read half of it and it kinda got less interesting, so freed it..

CkisgoD said...

@GS

Gethu...
Gandhi rocks, dude. People are entitled to their opinions... totally true, man. Nobody can be universally loved or hated...

But sometimes when ppl argue just for the heck of it, it pisses me off too badly, ya know??

And Gandhi started the 'Phree' philosophy.. gethu!! Cheers! :D

CkisgoD said...

Yeah, and I managed to read the full autobiography... guess its with Sujeet@ NIT now... he took it 4m me n he loved it..

Jjkk said...

freee... frst of all... thk of the situation wen gandhi came to india... he ws half-rotten... quite old... and lets face it... frm the "thayir-saadham" community....

all dat he can do is go in a "i wont talk...i wont eat" way only...
u can call him a leader cos he had bunch of coward faggots who failed to support the aggressive fighters at the same time...

u njoyed RDB-the movie... cos it symbolised the aggression of the xtremists like azad... bhagat singh etc...

aggression yields results....

the hunger strikes made by gandhi were way too subtle and passive... dat it irritated not only the brithishers but also sum of the indians...

but stil ppl folllowed him... cos they don wanna giv up their life jus like dat... gandhi was a lawyer by proffession... so he definitely knows to use wrds at ease.... dat is why the britishers let him go....

and abt splittin of nation.. dat was way too stupid....

the kashmir is the reall trouble 4 india now.... it costs india 1000 crores every year..... dats huge mann!!!...ther r a lotta soldiers up der who dunno abt their fate and wen their lifes gonna end...

so y cant sum1 pull out a "gandhi" and giv it up jus like dat.... dat wld giv solution for all the inflation crisis etc....

still u cant.. there r sumtings whch r wrth nt givin up... "gandhi did it jus cos he didn want ppl to die...."

WTF????

"u cant make omelets.. without breakin sum eggs"... ("joker" jack nicholson frm batman)

if everybody follows ahimsa.... then the whole world wil be disastrous... silence is nt a powerful, but worsttt weapon..

gandhii was too tired to lift his hand up against the vellaikara boys.. meanwhile gueverra and castro fot wen they wer young... if gandhi wldve been there... he wldve been chucked of the cntry.... fortuanately he ws in india... wer a larger portion of the community was not up for agrressive moves....

dats indian nature.... as russell peters says... "we r cheap bastards" mann....

P.S: mouli... is thala.... fcuk u ck and u too GS

CkisgoD said...

@ Jaggenius

i liked RDB, dude.. but life doesn't work that way, unfortunately. I like Tyler Durden, too.. but in real life, he's just a maniac, man..!

Both extremes are stupid.. Gandhian values cannot be fully followed in today's world, obviously. Can u follow rigorous communism as prescribed by Lenin?? Can you follow rigorous capitalism and witness the downfall of the labor front??

Every ideology needs to be moderated... every idea needs to grow and mold. One man's dream doesn't drive a country.

As for your anti-Gandhian rhetoric, i don't even wanna entertain it with a response. As GS said.. to each his own. Fuck u 2...( with the same honesty)...cheers :D

Shriram said...

won't take more than a minute to line up a 1000 british men n shoot their asses off, will it?... but what fuck will be the difference between em n us if we follow their ways of insanity?...It's important to u'stand that the term 'revolution' doesn necessarily have to point to years of blood-fed war and violence...
Gandhi was a great man because he stuck to his principles, heaven or hell... n he was a great leader because he managed to lead millions of em on his principles...
Try doin that today, n before ya can find sum few men to stick to ur side, sum bloody politician will shove up his ass into ur wayy...

Bottomline: Always cozier to comment than to stand in those shoes n take it up..

barry said...

Some of the greatest souls to have prowled this earth departed with a bullet.. Same was the case of The Father of Our Nation.. He is one in a trillion mate.

I guess India needs another Mohandas Gandhi to prevent its destruction..

And nice article.. well written and engrossing.. Keep up the good work..

rt said...

seriously a great post. "to live" for a cause is more effective than to die for it.when most ppl dont even have the basic decency to keep the streets clean by not littering it, they have to think lot of times b4 commenting on gandhi's morals.we need to lean to shut up from passing comments on late icons and start thinking abt how we can be of use to our country instead of unwanted excess baggages.

CkisgoD said...

@ Shriram

Totally true, man. Anyone can sit back n comment... i guess thats the difference between the commoners and the great men. Very few men of action 2day.


@ Barry

Thx!
India needs another Gandhi... but its a wonder if even he'll be able to unite us. Back then, it was an india of hindus-muslims... now its an india torn into a million castes, scheduled tribes n all that. nobody can keep count.


@ Arthi

I've been trying to shut a few of the buggers up, but freedom of expression works all the wrong ways. Anyways best v can do is ignore em... thanks for the compli, btw..!

Jjkk said...

wow!!!!... evrybody is ganging up on me... i suppose..... freeee...
i didn say gandhism is wrst....
its a gr8 principle.... aye aye SIR!!....

but it wasn dat effective to bring freedom 4 our ppl..... he is a gr8 man.... i agree.. but he never fits in the "mahatma" tag.... he was divertin the ppl towaards the othr way..... when the whole of india supported extremism.....

of crse its a pain in the ass....wen u carry those responsibilities on ur shoulders...

i agreeee.... but wats rong in pointing the worst???

gandhiism is a one-time thingi.... ahimsa was yet-another-method.... which contributed for the freedom struggle...

but one thing abt gandhi is his freee philosophy(courtesy: GS).... i totally agreee widdat.... but the rest....
am sry....

freeeeee

rover said...

firstly ck.. i have your "my experiments".. felt slightly guilty on reading this post!..hope u wont need it anytime now since u have fully realised d mahatma..

its true.. d guy rocks..
one event in the book is when he goes 2 south africa and is compelled and pressurised by the babus there to convert to christianity, he replies that he hasnt learnt his present religion fully. it would only be a sin to abandon it halfway and go to another faith. its the way the man thought. the way he saw things. he served spirituality with some realistic seasoning and garnishing for the layman, very few attempted that.

totally agree with you about his courage to own up his errors. i'd shoot myself than admit that i was in jilpanse when my father was in death bed.

he was the perfect teacher. there could never have been a better example of practising what you preached.

one more thing you could say about him is the way he bonded with people of different origins. he worked on the similarities, learnt their language, practised their customs etc. had he been the external affairs minister of our country....

definitely..very few inspirational souls in the country. i have always felt that we lacked inspirational speeches that we could always look up for kicks. think about john f kennedy- "ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country"

things like- "gimme blood.. i ll give ya freedom" -subhash chandra bose.
damn! i would ve slit my neck open for him if i were there.

even gandhi spoke many a thought provoking line..
"earth is enough for every man's need, not for every man's greed"
"hate the sin, not the sinner" (philosopy in style)


and look at the speeches we have today.
"this independence day occasion, lets resolve to make india a more prosperous blah blah blah.. fight terrorism with an iron hand blah blah.."
aam admi.. goyya admi.. crap!

when there is a terrorist attack.
"i condemn the attack"..
a more stronger reply.."i strongly condemn the attack.."
yea thats what maked the terrorist pee.. condemning.. horse shit..

we need to pay him the smallest tribute man. be more responsible citizens in a nation that he created for us. elect responsibly. educate the most powerful guy in the country-the voter, kick the asses of corrupt, sycophantic, no-gooders..

Aparna said...

at last i can see one person who supports gandhian views!!!!!! gr8 change or better 2 say revolution in u.....